Shrek Forever After -- 6 / 10

It's amazing what can be accomplished when you follow a script -- right, Meyers? It's no secret that Mike Meyers, while being a funny-man, has a bit of an issue with "ad-libbing" his scripts, which I [personally] tack to the failing fall of the Austin Powers series. The first was Lolerific and amazing, and down-hill from there. But we're not here to discuss that, we're here to discuss a ... hopefully ending trilogy quadilogy.

Honestly, I swear -- I just changed the title cause I thought this was shrek 3. LOL!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892791/

So. The movie was actually pretty funny, but I wouldn't go all out and scream it to the world. The first was still my favorite so far, and the second/third whichever-- sucked. I don't think I even saw the third one, lol. I don't remember, I don't know -- but I felt this movie was good enough to throw-down on a quick review.

Ha - my bad. I stopped to watch the Season of the Witch trailer, as you'll most likely get a review for this coming Friday, but that goes to show how much I really cared about this film, lol.

Synopsis: Rumpelstiltskin or however the hell it's spelled, is back at his trickery again and originally tried to magically deed the entire kingdom to himself, by blackmailing the king and queen of Ever After. Yadda, yadda - he tricks Shrek and then the adventure begins!

Pros: Uhm, I suppose the plus would have to be the funnies. The world is switched around and Witches and Rumpel now run things, which is full of lols, and now apparently there are more ogres? Yeah, I know - wtf. Shrek is suddenly not as special as he once was. Lol. Way to go, DreamFail. =/

Cons: Uhm ... it's like the 4th or 5th one now? And they're not getting any funnier. Lol. The first was the best.

Over-all: Netflix. And I've lowered the rating twice since I started writing this review. Lmfao... Don't let all the negativity fool you. It's a kids movie, and it's pretty amusing.